Reducing
Inflammation with Proteolytic Enzymes, Part One: Absorption and Sources
G.
Douglas Andersen, DC, DACBSP, CCN
Volume
15, number 17, 7/12/99, page 32
This includes an updated version of an earlier series. Part I discusses
animal and vegetable-based enzymes.
This month we will continue the theme of naturally reducing inflammation
by focusing on proteolytic enzymes. Proteolytic enzymes sever peptide
bonds in proteins with varying degrees of specificity. When an injury
occurs, the body responds with an inflammatory cascade. Excessive inflammation
can retard the healing process. Proteolytic enzyme supplementation reduces
inflammation by neutralizing bradykinins and pro-inflammatory eicosanoids
to levels where the synthesis, repair and regeneration of injured tissues
can begin. Proteolytic enzymes do not completely inhibit all phases of
the inflammatory cascade to a point where the body is unable to trigger
the normal healing process.
Absorption
In digestive physiology, we learn that proteins are digested in the stomach
and small intestines and absorbed as single amino acids, dipeptides and
tripeptides. The dipeptides and tripeptides are then further broken down
into single amino acids by gut enterocytes, where they then enter portal
circulation. Since proteolytic enzymes are proteins, many people feel
they have no biological activity other than that of a protein source,
and are simply digested as expensive protein fragments with inert properties.
A literature review yielded studies beginning with Brendel, et al., in
1956, who demonstrated that trypsin had an anti-inflammatory action when
administered buccally.1 In 1957, Martin, et al.,
showed that when trypsin, chymotrypsin and papain were injected into the
small intestines, they were not denatured or digested, but absorbed with
enough of the molecules intact to exert marked systemic anti-inflammatory
effect. They theorized that enterically coating these substances would
enable them to be administered orally.2
Ambrus, et al., showed that oral administration of enterically coated
trypsin and chymotrypsin resulted in increased specific blood activity
changes that could occur only if these enzymes were absorbed intact.3
Vakians demonstrated that enterically coated chymotrypsin was absorbed
orally and remained functional in the blood stream for four hours after
administration.4 Miller and Opher showed in 1964
that enterically coated bromelain given orally caused an increase in blood
serum proteolytic activity.5 Innerfield and Wernick
showed that oral administration of papain resulted in a decreased clotting
time.6 Along with increased serum levels and reduced
clotting times, other methods used by researchers to prove oral enzymes
were absorbed at levels where physiologic effects occurred included enzyme
proteolytic activity, antibody identification, radiographic tracing and
electrophoretic separation.5,7,8,9 There were enough
studies on the absorption of proteolytic enzymes beginning in the late
1950s and throughout the 1960s that researchers were able to conclude
that the classic theory of a protein impermeable intestinal barrier was
simply incorrect.7
There were two other interesting findings: proteolytic enzymes ingested
on an empty stomach can retain up to 40% of their activity, and proteolytic
enzymes appear to have an affinity to accumulate at sites of inflammation.10
When nonsteroidal anti-inflammatories began to appear on the market in
the 1960s, interest in proteolytic enzymes decreased dramatically. There
was very little research on enzymes in the 1970s and 1980s. In the 1990s,
some scientists began to take another look at proteolytic enzymes. There
were some impressive European studies that showed marked reductions in
healing times of patients who used proteolytic enzymes.11,12
In 1998, researchers gave bromelain and trypsin at 400 to 800 mg four
times a day for four days to 21 people. They found that the plasma levels
of both enzymes increased and that these increases correlated with the
amount of enzymes supplemented. They concluded that the absorption of
large protein molecules of proteolytic enzymes does occur, and they felt
this could explain why proteolytic enzymes have been successfully used
to treat posttraumatic inflammation, edema and bruising.13
This year, in a double-blind, placebo-controlled investigation, researchers
gave a seven-enzyme mixture that included 75 mg of trypsin, 50 mg of papain
and 50 mg of bromelain four times per day, beginning 24 hours prior to
and 48 hours following downhill running. The researchers reported that
there was less muscle soreness in the group that supplemented with the
enzymes.14 My extrapolation from this study is as
follows:
- There was less soreness in the muscles because there was less inflammation
in the muscles.
- There was less inflammation in the muscles because the enzyme mixture
was obviously not digested and absorbed as inert single amino acids.
Animal-Based Enzymes
Animal-based proteolytic enzymes come from the pancreases of pigs and
cows. These glands are defatted and dried, yielding a raw pancreatin mixture
that includes trypsin, chymotrypsin and other peptidases. Further refinement
yields a trypsin-chymotrypsin blend with significantly more trypsin.10
Trypsin hydrolyzes peptide bonds at arginine and lysine linkages.
Chymotrypsin hydrolyzes peptide bonds at carboxyl groups.10
When animal-based enzymes are enterically coated, they are able to resist
stomach acidity, thus yielding higher serum levels.
Vegetable-Based Enzymes
Bromelain is a group of enzymes derived mostly from pineapple stems. Some
scientists categorize bromelain as a member of the bioflavonoid family.
Bromelain has a very wide range of activity for severing peptide bonds.10
Papain and chymopapain are derived from papaya fruit. The range of activity
from papaya-based enzymes is similar to that of bromelain.10
Fungal proteolytic enzymes are usually derived by fermentation of various
strains of aspergillus. They also exhibit a broad range of activity to
sever peptide bonds.10
Vegetable-based enzymes also work better when they are enterically coated.
Because of its wide range of pH stability, bromelain can be effective
even if it is not enterically coated.10
Next month, we will discuss common uses of enzymes along with side effects,
dosing protocols and measuring activity.
References
1. Brendel R, Beiler JM, Martin GJ. American Journal of Pharmacology 1956;128:172.
2. Martin GJ, Brendal R, Beiler JM. Uptake of labelled chymotrypsin across
the GI. American Journal of Pharmacology 1957;129:194-197.
3. Ambrus JC, Lassman HB, Marchijj DE. Absorption of exogenous and endogenous
proteolytic enzymes. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 1967;8(3):362-367.
4. Vakians A. Further studies on the absorption of chymotrypsin. Clinical
Pharmacology and Therapeutics 1964:5(6):712-715.
5. Miller J, Opher A. Increased proteolytic activity of human blood serum
after oral administration of bromelain. Exp Med Surg 1964;22:277.
6. Innerfield I, Wernick T. Plasma anti-thrombin alterations following
oral papain. Proc Soc Ext Biol Med July 1961;107:505-506.
7. Miller J. Absorption of proteolytic enzymes from the gastrointestinal
tract. Clinical Medicine October 1968;75:35-40.
8. Ito C. Anti-inflammatory actions of proteases, bromelain, trypsin and
their mixed preparations. Folia Pharmacol JPN 1979;75:227.
9. Kabacoff B, Wohlman A, et al. Absorption of chymotrypsin from the intestinal
tract. Nature 1963;199:815.
10. Bucci L. Nutrition Applied to Injury Rehabilitation and Sports Medicine.
Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 1995.
Kline M. Introduction to systemic enzyme therapy and results of experimental
trials. In: Hermans G, Mosterd W (eds.) Sports Medicine and Health. Excerpta
Medica, 1990;1131.
11. Rahn HD. Efficacy of hydrolytic enzymes in surgery. In: Hermans G,
Mosterd W (eds.) Sports Medicine and Health. Excerpta Medica, 1990;1135.
12. Donalp H, et al. Dose-related bioavailability of bromelain and trypsin
after repeated oral administration. Clinical Pharmacology Therapeutics
1997;61:157.
Bailey SP. Effects of protease supplementation on muscle soreness following
downhill running. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise May 1999;31(5):A214,
S76.
916
E. Imperial Hwy.
Brea, CA. 92821
(714) 990-0824
Fax:
(714) 990-1917
gdandersen@earthlink.net
www.andersenchiro.com
Copyright
2004, G. Douglas Andersen, DC, DACBSP, CCN, 916 E. Imperial Hwy, Brea,
CA 92821, (714) 990-0824
|