Glycosaminoglycans:
Interview with Luke Bucci, Part II
G.
Douglas Andersen, DC, DACBSP, CCN
Volume
13, number 15, 7/17/95, page 18
Questions and answers concerning glycosaminoglycans, chondroitin sulfate,
and glucosamine sulfate.
Editor's note: This is Part II of Dr. Andersen's four-part interview
with Luke Bucci, PhD, CCN. Part I of the interview was published in the
June 19th issue of "DC." Stay tuned for Part III (Aug. 15),
and Part IV (Sept. 12).
Dr. Andersen: Dr. Bucci, in your book, Nutrition Applied
to Injury Rehabilitation and Sports Medicine, there was an interesting
chapter on glycosaminoglycans. There seems to be a controversy whether
chondroitin sulfates are absorbed orally.
Dr. Bucci: Oh, yes. That's a lot of fun for me because
it's one of these cases where a certain unnamed doctor who is working
mostly for a supplement company boxed himself into a corner by finding
an article on rabbits that used flawed technology to show that chondroitin
sulfates were not absorbed well orally. If you look at the literature
in humans, it is absorbed well. We're not rabbits, we're people.
Dr. Andersen: What is the dose range for chondroitin
sulfates?
Dr. Bucci: I've had a lot of experience with this, and
the company that I used to work for did have chondroitin sulfate. Number
one, it must be pure, and there is no way to really know that unless you
start using it. If it doesn't work, it might not really be pure. I've
seen bogus chondroitin sulfate before. I have talked with the suppliers
of chondroitin sulfate raw material that everyone uses, and they have
two grades. There is a very crude grade that's really trachea powder,
barely refined, which is perhaps 30-40 percent chondroitin sulfates in
a form that is very difficult for the body to absorb. Then there is the
really pure stuff that varies from 80-100 percent purity, and is quite
absorbable, but is also much more expensive. The dosages, based on heart
disease studies, are a gram or two a day.
Dr. Andersen: I had no idea the quality of chondroitin
sulfates varies so much, and that there isn't an easy way to determine
if a product is bioactive and absorbable.
Dr. Bucci: Overall, I think the situation is unfortunate,
because when chondroitin sulfate is pure it can do some really amazing
things. I think what has hurt chondroitin sulfate use is the fact that
there have been sources out there that have not been pure. Practitioners
must not purchase products without full disclosure labels.
Dr. Andersen: Dr. Bucci, is perna canaliculus the same
substance as green-lipped mussel?
Dr. Bucci: Yes.
Dr. Andersen: What is this used for?
Dr. Bucci: I think it's a delicacy, but it is used for
rheumatoid arthritis in particular.
Dr. Andersen: Does it work?
Dr. Bucci: I don't think so. It's not supported in the
literature.
Dr. Andersen: What about hyaluronic acid or hyaluronate?
Does it work?
Dr. Bucci: Yes, it works but it is really very specific
for joints, especially synovial fluid as an injectable. In fact, it is
licensed as a drug for vet use in the United States, but not for humans,
interestingly enough. Orally no one has looked at it, which I find really
surprising. I think they figure it is such a big long polymer that it
can't get in and do the same type of mechanical things. I agree with that,
but I think it is an expensive source of glucosamine.
Dr. Andersen: Speaking of glucosamine, it has been getting
a ton of press, and is now sold by almost every company serving practitioners
of nutritional medicine. What's the best type, what's the dose, and are
there different grades of purity?
Dr. Bucci: I just received information I didn't have
for my book. I prefer glucosamine hydrochloride for a variety of reasons.
Dr. Andersen: Everything I've read so far says glucosamine
sulfate is the best form.
Dr. Bucci: Oh yes, that's what all the studies have been
done on.
Dr. Andersen: Are you saying that glucosamine hydrochloride
is a better form than glucosamine sulfate?
Dr. Bucci: Yes, but it's only slightly better. It's not
a huge difference, but there's less room for fooling around with the hydrochloride
than there is with the sulfate.
Dr. Andersen: Explain that.
Dr. Bucci: There's a nice little story. The reason the
sulfate got all the studies from the Europeans is because the hydrochloride
and the acetylglucosamine had already been patented, so the sulfate was
pretty much the last one that could be patented.
Dr. Andersen: What do you mean by "fooling around?"
Dr. Bucci: Glucosamine sulfate is less stable than glucosamine
hydrochloride. In fact, hydrochloride is used to stabilize glucosamine
sulfate. What the nutrition supplement industry is doing now is using
salt instead of glucosamine hydrochloride to stabilize the glucosamine
sulfate. That is where there is room for fooling around with the label.
The glucosamine sulfate that is commercially available in this country
for supplement use is 20-30 percent sodium chloride. In some cases I think
we are seeing 500 mg of powder, which is 20-30 percent salt. Glucosamine
sulfate is wonderful stuff, but actual pharmaceutical studies have been
done with glucosamine sulfate that is six percent glucosamine hydrochloride.
So that's the rub. We have not duplicated that in the supplements sold
in our country.
Dr. Andersen: I carry products whose label states it
is pure 100 percent glucosamine sulfate with no fillers, binders, excipients,
or coatings. It comes in capsules and is quite expensive.
Dr. Bucci: It's impossible to get pure glucosamine sulfate.
You can't have it pure. You have to have a stabilizer in it.
Dr. Andersen: What advice do you have for chiropractors
who prescribe products with labels that are supposedly full disclosure,
but apparently are not?
Dr. Bucci: Good luck. I know a couple of companies who
are true to their labels, the rest I haven't had a chance to analyze.
Companies selling glucosamine sulfate popped up like mushrooms. This issue
is important enough to state a name here. Dr. Kauffman from Progena Laboratories
is aware of the situation, and he lists the actual glucosamine sulfate
content on the label. He has factored in the salt amount, and what he
is doing is putting in the extra raw material to make the glucosamine
sulfate really be what's on the label. There is a product called Cosamin
from Nutramax Labs in Baltimore, and they have glucosamine hydrochloride.
They are actually the first ones with pure glucosamine in the United States.
Dr. Andersen: What is the dose for glucosamine supplementation?
Dr. Bucci: Based on the literature, the patient would
need to take 1500 mg a day of the product for six to eight weeks. After
that, they could either reduce their dose as symptoms dictate, or get
off the product if they do not feel it was of benefit to them.
Dr. Andersen: What about companies who have products
with only a few hundred milligrams of glucosamine in them?
Dr. Bucci: In the industry, this is what we call "fluff."
A few hundred milligrams of glucosamine a day is not enough to have the
therapeutic effect. However, it can have a placebo effect. Giving a few
hundred milligrams of glucosamine would be like a family practitioner
prescribing 100 mg of ibuprofen a day. And, speaking of ibuprofen, I would
like to remind doctors considering using glucosamine that its analgesic
effects do not become apparent until the product has been consumed regularly
over an adequate period of time. It's not like non-steroidal, anti-inflammatories
in which the patient will feel its effect shortly after dosage.
Dr. Andersen: Is there any research coming out on glucosamine
hydrochloride?
Dr. Bucci: Yes, the Nutramax Company is conducting research
with several different universities around the country. Some is mammal
research which is a little bit tighter than human research, so the results
should be real interesting.
Dr. Andersen: What about N-acetylglucosamine, the third
form of glucosamine?
Dr. Bucci: Well, it's not bad, but it's not as good as
the other two. I rank it a distant third because it is metabolized differently
in the body. N-acetylglucosamine is used to form glycoproteins. It's hard
to find a protein that doesn't have N-acetylglucosamine on it. When you
give it orally, after absorption the liver and other tissues grab most
of it, leaving very little for the joints. If you could take three or
four times the dosages it might work.
Dr. Andersen: So, what do you recommend the N-acetylglucosamine
form for?
Dr. Bucci: I think it is excellent and probably preferred
for gastrointestinal problems, such as ulcers, colitis, and things like
that. However, for musculoskeletal conditions, I would stick with glucosamine
hydrochloride or glucosamine sulfate.
Dr. Andersen: The literature behind the glucosamine sulfate
certainly is impressive, although I must admit I would like to see more
current studies on this substance done in our own country.
Dr. Bucci: I have been trying to instigate some of that
myself and I think I've gotten some ears turned finally. The problem is
that it is patented pretty tight and no one can bust in on it, so no drug
company will do it.
Dr. Andersen: Maybe all the companies that sell this
stuff to chiropractors could take a percentage of their profits and fund
a study through one of our colleges. I would like to see supplement companies
that supply chiropractors get involved in more research. Well-designed,
positive U.S. studies would make the news and skyrocket sales. If the
research is negative, I would respect and expect those companies to publish
the data anyway.
916
E. Imperial Hwy.
Brea, CA. 92821
(714) 990-0824
Fax:
(714) 990-1917
gdandersen@earthlink.net
www.andersenchiro.com
Copyright
2004, G. Douglas Andersen, DC, DACBSP, CCN, 916 E. Imperial Hwy, Brea,
CA 92821, (714) 990-0824
|