Glucosamine,
Part II: Forms
G.
Douglas Andersen, DC, DACBSP, CCN
Volume
16, number 13, 6/15/98, page 26
Forms of glucosamine are discussed along with medical bias at the time.
Before we discuss which form of glucosamine to use, we must answer the
question, "Does glucosamine work?" Although the answer may seem
obvious to those of us in the chiropractic and nutrition communities,
many scientists and doctors do not feel glucosamine supplementation is
beneficial for arthritis and related connective tissue dysfunction. Editors
of both the Harvard and Berkeley health letters last year were not impressed
with glucosamine. Both cited lack of research, and the Berkeley letter
stated, "American researchers really are searching for an arthritis
cure and important studies are underway. Many agents are under intensive
study as potential cartilage regenerators. Glucosamine and chondroitin
sulfate are not actually very high on this list."1
All that most chiropractors want is the truth, and the truth is that there
has been very little U.S. research on glucosamine, but the same cannot
be said of Europe. There have been more than 300 investigations including
20 double-blind studies in the early 1980s on glucosamine.2 The Italian
company Rotta states that over 6,500 people with osteoarthritis (including
2,000 with knee degenerative joint disease and 2,000 with spinal DJD)
have now been studied using glucosamine sulfate with an across-the-board
average of 80% of patients reporting benefits from glucosamine. These
benefits were the reduction of joint pain and an increase in joint mobility.3
Many of the European studies compared glucosamine sulfate to nonsteroid
anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). In those studies the trend was for the
nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory groups to feel better initially, but after
three to six weeks the glucosamine groups would, on average, feel as good
or better than the people taking the NSAIDs. Furthermore, the rate of
side effects is consistently much lower in all glucosamine groups.
Glucosamine is now registered as an aid for osteoarthritis in over 70
countries and sometimes classified as a "slow-acting" drug for
osteoarthritis.
Forms of Glucosamine
Glucosamine sulfate (stabilized with sodium chloride). This is usually
provided in 500 mg capsules and is the type of preparation used in the
vast majority of positive human studies.
Glucosamine sulfate (stabilized with potassium chloride). Anecdotal reports
from my patients who use this form fall in line with the research on people
who used glucosamine sulfate stabilized with sodium chloride; that is,
approximately 80% of patients who take it feel a benefit.
N-acetyl Glucosamine (NAG). In last year's best seller, The Arthritis
Cure, by Theodosakis, Adderly and Fox, the authors stated that it did
not matter which form of glucosamine a person takes -- they will all work.4
However, the majority of experts in the field feel that the NAG form is
not effective for arthritis and should be avoided. NAG is metabolized
differently than other forms of glucosamine. Instead of being absorbed
relatively intact, the intestinal bacteria digest it rapidly and other
tissues of the gastrointestinal tract absorb it before it can reach cartilage.
Glucosamine hydrochloride. Some researchers now feel that glucosamine
hydrochloride may be the best form because it has a slightly higher concentration
of glucosamine in the molecule (83% versus 80% for glucosamine sulfate)
and has better stability.5
Debate
There is no argument that almost all of the studies done on oral glucosamine
have used a glucosamine sulfate form stabilized with sodium chloride.
There is debate about glucosamine sulfate because some bargain basement
brands will have 500 mg capsules that contain 20% sulfate and 20% sodium,
leaving only 300 mg of elemental glucosamine. Patients who think they
are taking 1500 mg per day may actually only be getting 900 mg per day.
Products that cater to health care professionals and are available to
chiropractors generally do not have this problem. Good brands will list
elemental totals and their base. For example, the product used in my office
is 500 mg glucosamine sulfate in a base of 666 mg of glucosamine sulfate,
and is stabilized with potassium chloride.
The future for glucosamine hydrochloride looks bright; however, there
have been very few human studies on this form. The debate surrounding
glucosamine hydrochloride centers around sulfur. Proponents of glucosamine
hydrochloride feel that the sulfur portion of glucosamine sulfate is removed
during digestion and not utilized by cartilage. The body gets sulfur,
which is a critical nutrient for GAG synthesis, from high energy phosphate
compounds, sulfur-containing amino acids, and inorganic sulfate.6
Proponents of glucosamine sulfate disagree and feel that glucosamine sulfate
does provide chondrocytes with a sulfur source required for the manufacture
of chondroitin sulfate and keratan sulfate glycosaminoglycans.7
Conclusion
When human trials on glucosamine sulfate stabilized with potassium chloride
and glucosamine hydrochloride are performed, I expect that these preparations
will work as well as the glucosamine sulfate form stabilized with sodium
chloride. Based on current research, the N-acetyl glucosamine form is
not effective for treating joint problems in humans. There are ongoing
studies on various forms of glucosamine. The results of these studies,
positive or negative, will be reported in this column. Next month, we
will continue our discussion by focusing on dosing, safety and side effects.
References
1. University of California Berkeley Wellness Letter May 1997; 13(8):2.
2. Murray MT. Which is better, glucosamine sulfate or chondroitin sulfate?
3. American Journal of Natural Medicine May 1997, 4(4):6-8.
4. Arthritis and articular cartilage: profile of glucosamine sulfate.
Rotta Pharm. Italy/Rotta Research Laboratorium.
5. Theodosakis, Adderly, and Fox. The Arthritis Cure. New York: St. Martin's
Press, 1997.
6. Bucci LR. Pain-Free. Ft. Worth, Texas: the Summit Group, 1995.
Bucci LR. Nutrition Applied to Rehabilitation in Sports Medicine. CRC
Press, 1995.
7. Murray MT. Glucosamine sulfate: effective osteoarthritis treatment.
American Journal of Natural Medicine September 1994, 1(1).
916
E. Imperial Hwy.
Brea, CA. 92821
(714) 990-0824
Fax:
(714) 990-1917
gdandersen@earthlink.net
www.andersenchiro.com
Copyright
2004, G. Douglas Andersen, DC, DACBSP, CCN, 916 E. Imperial Hwy, Brea,
CA 92821, (714) 990-0824
|